Supreme Court Magistrates Again Draw Fire for Overstepping Roles


The Fantastic Four: magistrates Sidney Blanco, Florentín Meléndez, Belarmino Jaime, and Rodolfo González

On July 25th, four of the five magistrates of the Constitutional Chamber of the Supreme Court provoked outcry when they signed a statement demanding the rejection of a citizen’s lawsuit that challenged the legality of their own seats on the bench. The suit sits before the Court’s Administrative Disputes Chamber and questions the 2009 elections of 10 Supreme Court magistrates by the National Legislative Assembly.

The four magistrates—popularly known as the “Fantastic Four”— have drawn frequent criticism for overstepping their judicial roles in a series of recent controversial rulings. Their signed order has no legal mandate, and magistrate Lolly Claros, President of the Administrative Disputes Chamber, called the statement “a total intrusion;" her colleague, magistrate José Roberto Argueta, deemed it “a troubling violation of judicial independence.”

 Meanwhile, the Constitutional Chamber has accepted two cases challenging the 2012 election of magistrate Salomón Padilla, President of both the Supreme Court and the Constitutional Chamber in which he serves, in part for his personal political affiliation with the leftist Farabundo Martí National Liberation Front (FMLN) party. Padilla has regularly been the lone opposition to decisions made by the “Fantastic Four.” FMLN Legislator and President of the Legislative Assembly Sigfrido Reyes criticized the magistrates’ decision to accept the challenges against Padilla, calling it “a huge paradox that those who entered [the Court] illegally judge someone who has legitimacy.”


[…] $300 million in Millennium Challenge Corporation (MCC) development funds, this time over a conflict between two Chambers of the nation’s Supreme Court. [[[[Over the last year, MCC funding has proven an effective instrument of US intervention, […]


Similar Entries

Meet some of the sustainers who power our work!

Profile Picture

My monthly donation is a small but meaningful way to invest in solidarity, sustain my own engagement in la lucha, and ensure that CISPES staff can count on funds to continue their important work.” - Amanda Kistler, Washington, DC

Join Amanda by becoming a sustaining donor to CISPES today!

Recent Posts

Voter during the 2014 Presidential Elections in El Salvador. Photo: CISPES

Sister Cities Network, Share Foundationand CISPES denounce the Trump administrations decision to rescind Temporary Protective Status (TPS) for over 200,000 Salvadorans Photo: Verdad Digital

Municipal workers in San Salvador remove political party announcements for the upcoming 2018 legislative and municipal elections. Photo: Contrapunto