by Lisa Skeen, from https://nacla.org/node/6389
For
residents of El Salvador’s northern department of Cabañas, 2009 was a
year fraught with political high drama that reached a tragic climax in
December with the assassination of two anti-mining activists. A public
commemoration of their work, which marked the start of 2010, was as
much a statement of solidarity as one of mourning.
On December 20, heavily armed gunmen evaded police protection and
murdered the vice president of an anti-mining environmental
organization, Ramiro Rivera Gómez. Six days later, Dora “Alicia”
Recinos Sorto, a prominent member of the same organization, was shot
and killed while returning home after washing clothes in a nearby
stream. She was pregnant and carrying her two-year-old son when she was
killed.
Rivera Gómez and Recinos Sorto were both residents of Nueva
Trinidad, where they worked with the Cabañas Environment Committee to
protest the opening of a new mining project by Vancouver-based Pacific
Rim Mining Corporation. The company has faced growing opposition from
residents of El Salvador’s northern departments, most notably against
the granting of exploitation concessions for the company’s El Dorado gold mine, located in the community of San Isidro.
It was in San Isidro in June that anti-mining activist, community
leader, and FMLN member Gustavo Marcelo Rivera was kidnapped and brutally murdered
in June. The attorney general’s office blamed the crime on gang
violence, though friends and family of the victim point to the body’s clear signs of torture as evidence of political motivation.
In the months since Rivera’s death, activists, journalists, and clergy members
have been threatened for their involvement in opposition to mining
activities. Sporadic, small-scale mining has taken place in the region
for centuries, and U.S.-based companies have conducted mining
operations since as early as the 1940s. Pacific Rim acquired its
flagship El Dorado mine in 2002 through a merger with another U.S. corporation.
In 2002, under the neoliberal policies of President Francisco
Flores’s ARENA administration, exploration permits were issued to
Pacific Rim. High gold prices in the early 2000s encouraged the
corporation to expand in the region, and multiple sites were identified
as potentially lucrative investments. Pacific Rim’s website lists two
other established projects in addition to the El Dorado mine, and a
recent article by Foreign Policy in Focus (FPIF) claims that Pacific Rim has identified 25 sites for gold extraction and invested almost $80 million dollars thus far.
Vocal opposition to the project has existed since its inception.
Gold mining involves the use of cyanide to separate the precious metal
from rocks; soil and water contamination is therefore common. According
to the FPIF article, all of the proposed sites are located along El
Salvador’s longest river, the Rio Lempa. Among Latin American nations,
only Haiti is ranked higher in water scarcity than El Salvador, and much of the country relies on this river alone for access to clean water.
As required by Salvadoran law, Pacific Rim submitted its first
environmental impact assessment (EIA) to the Salvadoran Ministry of
Environment and Natural Resources in 2004. Though the corporation
vehemently contended that it fully upheld Salvadoran law, activists
called the assessment a sham. An independent, nonpartisan review
of the environmental assessment, conducted in 2005 by hydro-geologist
Robert Moran, legitimized activist concerns. The prologue stated that
Moran’s review “highlights the near complete lack of baseline water
quality and quantity data in the El Dorado Gold and Silver Mining
project EIA, the lack of transparency in the public consultation
process that is required under Salvadoran Law, the failure to consider
the costs to the community of ‘free water use’ by the mining company,
and concludes that the EIA would not be acceptable in countries such as
Canada or the United States.” Public unrest further crystallized in
2008, when small-scale exploratory drilling on private land drained
local wells. Since then, the Salvadoran government has done little to
facilitate any movement in the permit process, essentially ignoring
Pacific Rim’s requests.
Though mining supporters are traditionally aligned with the
neoliberal policies of the ARENA and PCN parties (interestingly, the
department of Cabañas is still largely controlled by ARENA party
members), public outrage over the environmental assessment and
exploratory drilling proved to be game changers.
When incumbent ARENA president Antonio Saca faced an unexpectedly
powerful challenge from FMLN candidate Mauricio Funes, Saca broke with
tradition and announced one week before the election that he would
grant no new exploitation concessions to Pacific Rim. The gamble did
not pay off, and Funes, who did not support mining either, was elected
anyway. (See “The 2009 El Salvador Elections: Between Crisis and Change.”)
While much of the region looks to Funes to mitigate the harmful
social impacts of neoliberal economic policies of previous decades, the
ongoing confrontation between Pacific Rim and El Salvador has become
another framework from which to scrutinize the new administration.
On April 30, Pacific Rim initiated arbitration proceedings
under the rules of the Dominican Republic/Central American Free Trade
Agreement (DR-CAFTA), which El Salvador implemented in 2006. In 2007,
Pacific Rim acquired a U.S.-based subsidiary, and it is through this
backdoor route that the Canadian company has been able to file suit
with the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes, an
affiliate of the World Bank. Pacific Rim claims that due to El
Salvador’s failure to complete the permitting process, the corporation
has lost hundreds of millions of dollars.
Pacific Rim contends that the mining project would ultimately
benefit Salvadoran citizens, becoming the country’s greatest source of
tax revenue and generating thousands of jobs. In a phone conference,
the company’s CEO, Tom Shrake, claimed that only 25% of El Salvador’s
population opposed the mining, and accused the opposition of a
misinformation campaign. According to Shrake, “The idea that this type
of mining is catastrophic to the environment is pure fiction invented
by politically-minded international NGO’s who hide behind environmental
protection in their anti-development activities.”
News of the arbitration proceedings has met with mixed speculations
about how Funes will move forward and whether his administration will
be able to mark a true break from El Salvador’s economic past. Skeptics
point to the potentially astronomical cost of arbitration and
settlement if El Salvador chooses to fight instead of compromising with
Pacific Rim. However, members of environmental organizations and the
FMLN have sponsored legislation to outlaw all forms of metal mining in the country, which would be the first of its kind in the world if passed.
Furthermore, Funes made headlines
on January 12 while speaking at a ceremony celebrating the start of a
new school year, when he stated explicitly, “There can be no
misunderstanding: my government will not authorize any mining
extraction projects. . . . No one has convinced us that there are ways
to extract minerals and metals, especially metals, without
contaminating the environment and affecting public health.”
He went on to praise the work of recently murdered activists, who
“sacrificed their lives in pursuit of a better environment and a better
quality of life for Salvadorans,” and he assured the crowd that the
murders would be fully investigated. Though it may be long before
Salvadorans see any resolution to the DR-CAFTA proceedings and murder
investigations, residents of Cabañas may take some comfort in the
knowledge that their protests have been successful in at least
limiting, if not eliminating, international corporate access to El
Salvador’s natural resources.
Lisa Skeen is a NACLA Research Associate.
|